In this treatise
… there’s an error regarding the issue of Irjaa wherein I said:
“Therefore, someone who does not make Takfeer of a person who does not leave off actions cannot be considered as a Murji’ since in order for Irjaa to be ascribed to someone he has to put actions outside of Imaan.”
From two angles this is incorrect:
1. Saying that a person who leaves off all actions is a believer with reduced Imaan is from the Madhab of the Murji’ah.
2. That the one who says that the one who leaves off all actions is a believer is mistaken since actions are a pillar of Imaan and is therefore needed to establish it.
3. What should have been said is that the individual may have fallen into an error and cannot AUTOMATICALLY be ascribed to the Murji’ah. As to that which occured with Sh. Rabee as the Grand Mufti clarified. As for Imam Nasir Ud Deen Al Albani he believed that the one who leaves off all actions is a Kaafir as Sh. Suhaimi mentioned and as I mentioned in my rebuttal of Yasir Qadhi in the final pages (page 44) found here:
Please do make sure to read this important treatise which I posted on a later date.
May Allah bless the one who pointed this out to me. And if there are any concerns please feel free to e-mail me.
استغفر الله و اتوب اليه.