Unveiling the deception of ‘Abdullah Muhammad- Part 1

Assalamu Alaikum Wa Rahmatullah,

Part 1 of the series regarding the deception of ‘Abdullah Muhammad. The super-admin of trinimuslims.com.

Although I wrote it on the blog I made a few adjustments regarding what was said and also the fonts. It is on the following link:

http://aloloomenglish.net/vb/showthread.php?1049-Unveiling-the-deception-of-Abdullah-Muhammad-1

Clarification regarding Trini Muslims.com


In the name of Allāh, the Most Merciful, the Bestower of Mercy.

As-salāmu ‘alaikum wa rahmatullāhi wa barakātuh.All praise is for Allaah, Lord of the universe, and may His peace and blessings be on the foremost of those who fear Allaah and the seal of the prophets (Muhammad), as well as his family, his Companions and (all) those who follow them with goodness, until the Day of Recompense.It proceeds that, as for our site, TriniMuslims.com, and the fitnah between Al-Hujuree and his students, and the other brothers, which we have been pulled into by some of our own Administrators, and lead down a path, and in the taking of sides, and in the entering into speech and refutations regarding this, for which we had no place or authority in doing so, I, Abdullah Muhammad (Servant), Lead Admin, formally retract on behalf of the site, and I seek Allaah’s forgiveness for speaking (or rather allowing those to speak) before the scholars have spoken, and indeed He is Al-Wuduud, and al-Ghafur and al-Raheem. The Administration of TriniMuslims.com will now be reviewed inshaAllah, and changes are being made. The site, with the help of Allaah, azzawajal, will still strive to be upon the Dawatul-Haqq, as-Salafeeyah, and we will try inshaAllaah to be closer to the scholars of ahulul-Sunnah, and those that call to them. There are still many threads which are still ‘live’ on the site, and these will be cleared up in the coming weeks inshaAllah. And with Allaah is all true success.
Abdullah
TriniMuslims.com

I, Musa Millington, publicly distance myself from TriniMuslims.com due to Abdullah Muhammad’s high-handed totalitarian behaviour for the following reasons:

1. None of the administrators were met, advised or consulted before he took this decision when Allah ta’ala mentioned:

“و شاورهم في الأمر”

And consult them into the affair.

This is with the fact that I am on the brother’s e-mail list and that he has my phone number. He in fact called me some weeks ago and did not talk to me about this issue.

2. No one spoke before the scholars. Rather, people spoke when clear evidences were presented regarding the affair between the scholars. And if someone chooses to take the statement of a scholar based upon evidences how can this be deemed to be speaking before the scholars? 

Does the brother not know that it is compulsory to take the evidences when it comes?

3. No one took sides in this affair. Rather some brothers took the clear evidences. And some choose to follow their desires by rehashing:

- Issues that died over 10 years ago and were resurrected by Faalih Al Harbi. My brother, Abdullah, if I know for a fact that every single thing they say about Shaikh Yahya is based upon what was said by innovators such as Abu Hasan and Faalih must I take it?  Must I take what SPUBS say when Shaikh Suhaimi and Shaikh Rabee’ himself warned from the sites where SPUBS take from? Must I not help prevent SPUBS from oppressing others when it is clear that they have a clear agenda to possibly even call Shaikh Yahya an apostate?

But, no, rather my dear brother, you want me to be quiet because everything that SPUBS does is good and must not be criticized. Even though they take information from clear innovators regarding Shaikh Yahya.

But again you said to Hasan: You all only have Shaikh Yahya, they have the rest of the ‘Ulama.

What happened to the statement of Allah when he said:

“فإن تنازعتم في شيء فردوه إلى الله و الرسول…”

If you disagree about a matter return it to Allah and the Messenger.

4. Lastly, there is a statement which mentions:

“الحق أبلج و الباطل لجلج”

Therefore, the truth is clear. By Allah, what I have written pertains mostly to the crimes and excesses of Salafi Publications regarding these issues and they have become clear to anyone who has read them. From them:

1. The issue of the different poetry wherein the poets have retracted and Shaikh Yahya has spoken regarding his dislike for these things.

Yet SPUBS still insists that Shaikh Yahya nurtures them upon this. How can he nurture them upon it and he dislikes it and advises his students not to do it? This makes absolutely no sense to someone who has a mind which he uses.

2. The issues of ‘Aqeedah, the Sahabah, the Raafidah etc. Many of these issues were taken from Abu Hasan’s and Faalih’s bag of tricks. Yet SPUBS use them to disparage and demonize the Shaikh.

Oh SPUBS, is it lawful to take from unknown individuals and innovators to disparage a Sunni?

3. Taqleed of Shaikh Rabee’ when Shaikh Rabee’ said to go with the truth wherever it is.

4. Lying, which is from the traits of the Hizbees:

“I am not getting into the Fitnah between Shaikh Yahya and Shaikh ‘Ubaid, they are two great scholars.”

“We are not distributing Bayaan Al Fawri, this is a lie.”

“Ya Akhii I do not see what ‘Abdullah Al Bukhari said as a slander”

These are from the statements of Abu Khadeejah to me in Trinidad. And if he says I am lying I will challenge him to Mubahalah (putting the curse of Allah upon the one who is lying)

5. Your statement: “We will try to remain closer to the scholars of Ahlus Sunnah and those who call them.”

You mean Yusuf of Muwahiddeen Publications the known liar? The one who is known for plotting and planning on Ahlus Sunnah? To the extent that Abu Hakeem called Shaikh Ramzaan and got a disparagement on me without calling my name.

This is the one you associate with because he calls the scholars?

What about looking at his ‘Aqeedah. What about looking at his Manhaj. What about looking at his character?

Calling the scholars (because he can afford to) does not necessitate being upon the correct ‘Aqeedah and being upon knowledge. Rather it is being upon what the scholars are upon from following their ‘Aqeedah and methodology.

I was telling my family that people only say the scholars the scholars in this time. And that upon saying this they are not diligent in studying, reading, researching, memorizing etc. Ya Akhii, if you have 10 million tele-links but you are lazy, you do not revise, you do not memorize, you do not read, you do not apply what will it benefit you?

Knowledge is not so and so said this and that. Rather it is based upon evidences and clarification.

Hence, calling the scholars does not necessitate knowledge. Rather when one learns and studies what the scholars have said in and outside class would result in someone having knowledge.

May Allah help us to be upon the straight path.

Written by: Musa Millington with the compliance of Hassan Bassarally. Former administrators of Trinimuslims.com

Does Shaikh Yahya endorse extremism toward him?

My dear brothers,

We have to recognize that Salafi Publications is in such a pathetic position that they are trying to make it seem that Shaikh Yahya endorses and nurtured his students upon extremism toward him. To the point that they put up headlines which makes it seem that Shaikh Yahya encourages his students to violate Tawheed for his sake.

This is although it has been clarified in many instances that Shaikh Yahya:

i. Does not like it.
ii. Reprimands his students in private regarding it.
iii. Is unaware in many instances as to what is being said in the poetry.

And as for point number three I have witnesses who were in Dammaj who mentioned to me that Shaikh Yahya would just tell them to go up and read the poetry while he was paying attention to the many questions he has in his hands. (In fact that same brother told me he used to get irritated at the amount of poetry said).

Hence, these points have been clarified however, SPUBS still choose to grasp at straws. Their chain of narration leading back to unknown individuals hence automatically unacceptable. But besides that point these individuals who seek domination of the Da’wah of the West through their Machiavellian tactics just do not get it. As an elder brother who comes to my Monday class says all the time:

“If you look in the Qur’an therein you will find the answer”

Allah ta’ala said:

و لا تكسب كل نفس إلا عليها و لا تزر وازرة وزر أخرى

And every soul earns not (blame) except for itself and no bearer of burdens will bear the burden of another.

Hence, knowing that Shaikh Yahya discourages it, frowns upon it etc, how can he be blamed whenever some may say or do things to conflict his advice? This is indeed paramount to injustice and should be added to the crimes of Salafi Publications in Jarh Wa Ta’deel. Because the Jarh is to describe a narrator with an attribute wherein his narrations are rejected. Hence, the Jarh has to describe what the narrator said, did, permitted or encouraged.

Secondly, knowing the demographic of Yemen, there may be people who may have came recently to the Sunnah but were from Shee’ah and Sufi backgrounds. Therefore, it may be that some of the poets, who may be visitors from different places, made these mistakes thinking they were correct. However, afterward they were advised regarding the poems and thereafter repented.

Thirdly, again, when you do not put any emphasis on the Qur’an you make shallow assumptions.

What do I mean?

When Musa (عليه السلام) crossed the Red Sea his people told him give us a God as they have a God (which was an idol). Is Musa (عليه السلام) to be blamed for that? Is it going to be said that he nutured them badly? Never.

Is the Prophet (صلى الله عليه و سلم) to be blamed when some people, who were new to Islaam, upon going to Hunain, wanted to pay reverence to a tree? Never.

So how can Shaikh Yahya be blamed for the actions of some poets when the Shaikh himself does not encourage these actions??

Therefore, and again it shows that SPUBS run through books and “listen” to the scholars but they do not gain benefit. They have studied the 4 principles many times and never realized that one of the benefits of the Hadeeth of Abu Waaqid Al Laithi is that Shirk is something very easy to fall into without even realizing. And if they properly read the Chapter on Fearing Shirk from Kitaab Ut Tawheed they would realize this. Hence, when some poets make mistakes and slips it is ascribed to the poet, neither to Shaikh Yahya nor to what he teaches.

But again as the Hadeeth of Mu’awiyah in Saheeh Bukhari mentioned:

“من يرد الله به خيرا يفقهه في الدين”

Whoever Allah wants good for he makes him understand the religion.

So, my advice to Salafi Publications is to go back to the basics. Go and translate, buy and sell books. Also, take the advice of Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Haadi. You all are not teachers, you all have to simply translate the speech of the scholars in books then keep quiet afterward until you have enough respect for this religion to travel at the feet of the scholars and learn it. And when I say learn it I do not mean an ‘Umrah trip, I mean sit down, keep quiet and learn.

May Allah guide us and protect us from delusions of grandeur.